EnigmA Amiga Run 1997 July/EnigmA AMIGA RUN 20 (1997)(G.R. Edizioni)(IT)[!][issue 1997-07 & 08][EAR-CD IV].iso/lightwave/lwmlist/94.lightwave-07/000334_owner-lightwave-l _Wed Jul 20 15:52:17 1994.msg

Internet Message Format | 1994-08-07 | 2KB

Return-Path: <owner-lightwave-l>
Received: by mail.netcom.com (8.6.8.1/Netcom)     id HAA15883; Wed, 20 Jul 1994 07:41:47 -0700
Received: from westford.ccur.com by mail.netcom.com (8.6.8.1/Netcom)     id HAA15869; Wed, 20 Jul 1994 07:41:41 -0700
Received: from hubbub by masscomp.westford.ccur.com via TCP/IP with SMTP           id aa11078; 20 Jul 94 10:37 EDT
Received: from toaster by hubbub.westford.ccur.com           via TCP/IP with SMTP (local) id aa02803; 20 Jul 94 10:38 EDT
To: [e-mail]
Subject: Re: Field Rendering.
In-reply-to: Your message of Tue, 19 Jul 94 22:45:23 -0700.              <Pine.3.89.9407192237.A20770-0100000@netcom14>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 94 10:38:54 EDT
From: Mark Thompson <[e-mail]>
Message-ID:  <[e-mail]>
Sender: [e-mail]
Precedence: list
Reply-To: [e-mail]

John Gross <[e-mail]> writes:
> Actually, we render frames and use motion blur as that gives us more of a
> film quality look. 60 fields per sec looks great, but looks like video...
> I'm not sure what B5 does, but I believe its the same.

I was inspecting some B5 footage the other day and it appeared that they used
both field rendering and motion blur depending on the scene. Wherever the
motion was particularly fast, motion blur was used. Less demanding shots
used field rendering.
%~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~%
%      `       '        Mark Thompson                 CONCURRENT COMPUTER  %
% --==* RADIANT *==--   [e-mail]        Principal Graphics   %
%      ' Image `        ...!uunet!masscomp!mark       Hardware Architect   %
%     Productions       [phone] [phone]   & General Nuisance   %
%                                                                          %
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~